Fast facts:
| Specification | OceanWalker S60 | Lagoon Sixty 7 |
|---|---|---|
| LOA | 18.87 m (60 ft) | 20.15 m (66'1") |
| Beam | 8.38 m (27'6") | 10 m (32'10") |
| Cabins | 4 en-suite + 2 crew | 4–6 cabins |
| Standard propulsion | 2 × Volvo Penta D6-440 (880 hp) | 2 × Volvo Penta D6-340 (680 hp) |
| Optional propulsion | Not required — 440 hp is standard | 2 × Yanmar 6LY440 (~440 hp, 21 kn top speed) |
| Draft | Not publicly specified | 1.14 m (3'9") full load |
| Fuel capacity | Not publicly specified | 5,500 L (1,453 US gal), 4 tanks |
| Cruising range | Not publicly specified | ~1,200 nm at 12 kn cruise |
| Solar option | 22 panels, 9 kW | Not standard |
| Price | €3.2M — all options included | $3.5M–$3.87M (typical listings) |
| Availability | Available now | Order / brokered stock |
Both boats share the same basic formula this comparison is built around: twin slender hulls, a wide bridgedeck, and no mast or rig. The Lagoon Sixty 7 is the larger of the two at 20.15 m (66'1") versus the OceanWalker S60's 18.87 m (60 ft), with a wider beam at 10 m against the S60's 8.38 m. That extra six feet of length and beam is Lagoon's main selling point in this s60 vs lagoon sixty 7 comparison — more interior volume, at a proportionally higher price.
The Lagoon Sixty 7's design pedigree is well documented: naval architecture from VPLP (Marc Van Peteghem), exterior styling from automotive-design veteran Patrick Le Quément, and interiors from Nauta Design — the same team behind much of the wider Lagoon sailing range. It shares hull tooling with the sailing Sixty 5 sistership, but Lagoon re-engineered the underwater sections for the power version: flatter, longer aft sections to carry the extra weight of twin diesels and roughly 5,500 litres of fuel, plus a shallower 1.14 m draft than the sailing hull. The OceanWalker S60 takes a different route to the same twin-hull formula, built as a dedicated power platform from the outset rather than adapted from a sailing hull — a meaningful point of difference in the s60 vs lagoon sixty 7 conversation, since it removes any compromise inherited from a rig-carrying structure.
The Lagoon Sixty 7 offers 4–6 cabin configurations against the OceanWalker S60's fixed 4 en-suite + 2 crew layout, giving Lagoon buyers more flexibility for charter or larger family groups. Where the S60 competes is fit-out density per foot: at €3.2M for 60 ft, the S60 undercuts the Lagoon on a per-metre basis by a wide margin once the Sixty 7's higher price bracket is factored in.
Reviewers who have been aboard the Sixty 7 describe roughly 30 percent more usable floor area than the outgoing Lagoon 630 Motor Yacht it replaced, split across a flybridge lounge, a foredeck seating area linked to the salon by a full-height glass door, and a choice of galley-up or galley-down layouts finished in walnut, light oak or grey oak veneer. Cabin count is genuinely modular on the Sixty 7 — from a leaner owner's layout with generous ensuite space down each hull, up to a six-cabin charter configuration with a dedicated crew mess. The OceanWalker S60's 4 en-suite + 2 crew arrangement is fixed rather than modular, which simplifies the buying decision but means a family wanting six staterooms has to look at the Lagoon instead — one of the few places where the Sixty 7's extra length and beam translate into a genuine functional advantage rather than just headline size.
This is one area where the s60 vs lagoon sixty 7 comparison isn't as close as the spec sheets first suggest. The OceanWalker S60 comes standard with 2 × Volvo Penta D6-440 (880 hp combined). The Lagoon Sixty 7's standard engines are the smaller 2 × Volvo Penta D6-340 (680 hp combined) — the 440-class package (twin Yanmar 6LY440, roughly 434–440 hp each, good for a 21-knot top speed) is an extra-cost option on the Lagoon, not standard equipment. Buyers comparing headline power figures need to check which engine package a given Lagoon listing actually carries before assuming parity with the S60.
On the water, Lagoon's own private viewing data (with the optional Yanmar package, roughly a third fuel load and nine people aboard) recorded a 21-knot top speed, 0-to-top-speed acceleration around 35 seconds, and a fuel burn near 48 US gallons per hour flat out. Throttled back to a 12-knot cruise, the Sixty 7 is quoted at around 1,200 nautical miles of range; push the cruise speed to 14 knots and that range is roughly halved. The S60 additionally offers a solar-assisted option (22 panels, 9 kW) that keeps house systems running at anchor without the generator cycling — a feature not standard on the Lagoon at any engine spec.
It's worth being direct about one thing in any s60 vs lagoon sixty 7 search: Lagoon is, first and foremost, a sailing-catamaran builder — its range runs from the 40 up to the 82-foot Lagoon Eighty 3, almost entirely under sail. The Sixty 7 is the exception, one of a small number of dedicated power models Lagoon has produced, and it is a genuine motor yacht: twin diesels, no rig, no daggerboards — not a sailing hull with the mast removed. The distinction matters because the Sixty 7's underwater sections were specifically re-profiled for power use, flatter and longer aft than the sailing Sixty 5's hulls, to handle the extra weight that twin diesels and full fuel tanks add over a sailing sistership.
Where the s60 vs lagoon sixty 7 comparison genuinely diverges is cruising style rather than raw numbers. The Lagoon Sixty 7 carries 5,500 litres of fuel across four tanks and is built for long-range coastal and offshore passages — Lagoon markets it as capable of running long stretches of coastline largely without refuelling at a 12-knot cruise. The OceanWalker S60, at €3.2M with all options included, is positioned as a Mediterranean-ready demonstrator rather than a long-range ocean cruiser, and its optional solar array is built around day-to-day at-anchor living rather than multi-day passages. Buyers who prioritise long, unsupported range should weight the Sixty 7's published 1,200 nm figure heavily; buyers who prioritise lower purchase price and immediate availability get more boat for the money from the S60.
This is where the s60 vs lagoon sixty 7 comparison is most decisive: the OceanWalker S60 is priced at €3.2M with all options included and is available now as a Mediterranean demonstrator, while Lagoon Sixty 7 listings typically run $3.5M–$3.87M before options — and a well-specced new build with the optional Yanmar engines, a six-cabin layout and higher trim levels can climb well past $4M once ordered through a dealer. For six fewer feet of LOA, the S60 asks for meaningfully less money, and it doesn't carry the multi-month order queue a new Lagoon build usually does.
Currency matters here too: Lagoon Sixty 7 asking prices are usually quoted in US dollars through US and Caribbean brokers, while the OceanWalker S60 is priced in euros as a Mediterranean-market boat — at typical EUR/USD exchange rates the headline gap between the two is larger than the raw numbers suggest once currency is converted onto the same basis. Add in that the S60's €3.2M figure already includes the 880 hp standard engine package the Lagoon only offers as a cost option, and the effective like-for-like gap between a fully-specced Sixty 7 and the S60 widens further in the S60's favour.
Lagoon is the world's best-selling catamaran brand by volume, built by Groupe Bénéteau at its dedicated production facility, and that scale shows up in the used market: Lagoon models generally hold value well and are easy to place with brokers internationally, and used Sixty 7s (first delivered from 2019) already trade on platforms such as YachtWorld, with listings around the $3.5M mark for early hulls. That resale liquidity is a genuine point in the Sixty 7's favour in any s60 vs lagoon sixty 7 ownership discussion — a large, established dealer network worldwide makes a future sale more straightforward.
The OceanWalker S60 is a newer model with a shorter track record, so there isn't yet a comparable body of used-market data to cite — being honest about that gap matters more than guessing at a resale figure. What is verifiable in the s60 vs lagoon sixty 7 ownership question is running cost at the point of purchase: the S60's price already includes its options and its more powerful standard engines, so there's less scope for a buyer to under-spec the boat and face a costly retrofit later, whereas a Lagoon Sixty 7 bought on the standard 340 hp engines would need the optional 440 hp Yanmar package retrofitted or ordered upfront to match the S60's stock performance. Fuel and engine-hour maintenance costs on twin 340–440 hp diesels are broadly comparable between the two once options are matched.
For readers researching the s60 vs lagoon sixty 7 comparison further, two independent sources are worth checking directly: Lagoon's own official Sixty 7 specification page for the builder's current configuration options, and Yachting Magazine's private viewing review of the Lagoon Sixty 7 powercat for independently reported performance figures.
Yes — the Sixty 7 is 20.15 m (66'1") against the S60's 18.87 m (60 ft), with a 10 m beam versus the S60's 8.38 m.
On price per foot the OceanWalker S60 leads clearly: it's priced at €3.2M against Lagoon Sixty 7 listings that typically run $3.5M–$3.87M, despite the Lagoon's smaller size advantage in cabins only.
Solar is not standard on the Lagoon Sixty 7; the OceanWalker S60 offers a 22-panel, 9 kW solar array as an option, running house systems quietly at anchor.
It's a genuine power catamaran, not a converted sailboat — Lagoon's own dedicated power-cat variant of its Sixty-series hull, engineered with re-profiled underwater sections and different fuel tankage from the sailing Sixty 5 sistership it shares tooling with. This matters in any s60 vs lagoon sixty 7 comparison, since both boats being compared are true motor yachts with no rig.
Standard propulsion is 2 × Volvo Penta D6-340 (680 hp combined). The more powerful 2 × Yanmar 6LY440 package most private viewing reviews are tested with, good for a 21-knot top speed, is an extra-cost option — worth confirming on any specific listing.
Yes — the S60 is available now as a Mediterranean demonstrator; book a private viewing to compare it directly against a Lagoon Sixty 7 you may have already seen.
See the OceanWalker S60 before you decide
Compare the s60 vs lagoon sixty 7 numbers in person — the Mediterranean demonstrator is available for private viewing now.
Book a Private Viewing