Fast facts:
| Specification | OceanWalker S60 | Aquila 54 |
|---|---|---|
| LOA | 18.87 m (60 ft) | 16.5 m (54'2") |
| Beam | 8.38 m (27'6") | 7.68 m (25'2") |
| Propulsion | 2 × Volvo Penta D6-440 (880 hp combined) | 2 × 380 hp Volvo Penta D6 |
| Cabins | 4 en-suite + 2 crew | Compact standard layout |
| Price | €3.2M — all options included | $1.2M–$2.3M (typical listings) |
The Aquila 54 is notably smaller across the board: 16.5 m (54'2") LOA against the OceanWalker S60's 18.87 m (60 ft), and a narrower 7.68 m (25'2") beam versus the S60's 8.38 m. Aquila builds at higher volume, which shows in a more compact interior footprint than the S60's four en-suite cabins plus crew berths.
Beyond raw dimensions, the two boats differ in how they use the volume they have. The Aquila 54's 1.37 m (4'6") draft is notably shallow, useful for gunkholing in skinnier Bahamas- and coastal-style anchorages, while the OceanWalker S60's greater length, beam and displacement translate into steadier motion in a seaway and a larger accommodation footprint overall. For buyers weighing size against handling in this s60 vs aquila 54 comparison, the trade-off is fairly direct: the Aquila is the easier boat to dock and berth day-to-day, the S60 is the more spacious platform once aboard. Neither difference is inherently better; it comes down to the marinas a buyer typically visits and how much they value extra elbow room over manoeuvrability.
Aquila's 54 ships standard twin 380 hp Volvo Penta D6 diesels, lighter than the OceanWalker S60's 880 hp combined output from the same Volvo Penta D6 family. The S60's larger engines suit its longer hull and heavier displacement; Aquila's smaller powerplant matches its more compact size.
Fuel capacity fills in part of the range story: the Aquila 54 carries 2,200 L (581 gal) of diesel on its standard twin Volvo Penta D6-380 package (760 hp combined), and Aquila also offers higher-output engine packages on the 54 platform for buyers who prioritise speed over efficiency. The OceanWalker S60's 880 hp combined output has more reserve power to push a heavier, longer hull, which matters most when running fully loaded or against a headwind. Range and cruising speed, not headline horsepower alone, are usually what settle the s60 vs aquila 54 debate for buyers planning longer offshore passages rather than day-tripping. Owners who cruise mostly coastal, day-trip distances or short island hops tend to find the Aquila's standard power plenty; owners planning longer offshore legs, or who regularly run against wind and current, tend to appreciate the S60's extra reserve power more.
Aquila 54 listings typically run $1.2M to $2.3M, positioning it as an entry point into power catamaran ownership at a meaningfully lower price than the OceanWalker S60's €3.2M. Buyers choosing between the two are usually choosing between size and specification (S60) versus accessible entry price (Aquila 54) rather than comparing like-for-like boats.
Looking at price in isolation in the s60 vs aquila 54 debate can be misleading. Current new-build Aquila 54 Yacht listings span roughly $1.59M to $2.2M, averaging close to $1.8M, while the broader $1.2M–$2.3M range referenced above also captures brokerage listings of earlier model years. The OceanWalker S60's €3.2M is a single, all-options-included figure rather than a base price that climbs with each equipment tier — a structural difference worth factoring in before comparing headline numbers directly.
The Aquila 54 is sold with genuine layout flexibility: buyers can specify 3, 4 or 5-cabin configurations, add dedicated skipper's quarters, or choose a “galley-down” arrangement that frees up salon space. Every configuration keeps a full-beam owner's suite forward on the main deck, with large windows, opening portlights and a private en-suite head with a separate walk-in shower. That range of options is one of the clearer wins for Aquila in this s60 vs aquila 54 comparison for buyers who want to tailor the boat to charter use, family size, or crewed operation.
The OceanWalker S60 takes the opposite approach: a fixed 4 en-suite guest cabin plus 2 crew cabin layout that isn't offered in alternate configurations. That consistency simplifies the buying decision and keeps fit-out density high relative to the Aquila's more compact standard interior, but it removes the flexibility that Aquila's tiered cabin options give buyers who aren't yet sure how many guests or crew the boat needs to sleep.
Living space follows a similar pattern. On the Aquila 54, the panoramic salon with full-size refrigeration and oversized sliding doors opens directly onto the cockpit, and the flybridge doubles as an elevated social hub with multiple seating areas and a wet bar — a genuinely social layout for a boat in its size class, even if the overall footprint is smaller than the S60's. The S60's larger hull gives its fixed layout more headroom, wider passageways and larger cabins throughout, so buyers who plan to live aboard for extended periods, or who regularly host guests for multiple nights, tend to feel the size difference most in the accommodation deck rather than on the flybridge or in the cockpit.
Build origin is one of the first questions buyers raise in any s60 vs aquila 54 conversation, and it deserves a factual answer rather than a dismissive one. The Aquila 54 is built by Sino Eagle Group at its large-scale facility in Hangzhou City, China, under a partnership with MarineMax — the world's largest recreational boat and yacht dealer — that dates back to 2012 and remains MarineMax's official, exclusive distribution arrangement for the Aquila brand across the Americas. The 54 carries CE Category A ocean certification, meaning it meets the same offshore structural and safety standards required of any boat sold into that category, regardless of where it was built.
In the s60 vs aquila 54 build-quality conversation, it's worth noting that Chinese-built production catamarans like the Aquila range have become a normal, established part of the global power catamaran market over the past decade, backed in Aquila's case by MarineMax's dealer network for warranty support, service and parts across multiple countries. That volume-manufacturing model is precisely what allows Aquila to hold its price well below the OceanWalker S60, which is built in smaller numbers to a higher standard specification as delivered.
None of this is a quality verdict either way — it's a description of two different manufacturing philosophies. Sino Eagle's Hangzhou facility runs on a large, repeatable production line built for consistency across thousands of hulls, with MarineMax's network providing the after-sale service infrastructure that buyers of any imported production boat rely on. A smaller-volume builder like the one behind the OceanWalker S60 instead leans on closer oversight of a lower number of hulls and a more heavily specified standard build. Buyers comparing the two should judge each on its own certification, warranty terms and in-person inspection rather than assuming country of origin alone predicts the outcome.
Production volume shapes the s60 vs aquila 54 value question long after the purchase is made. Aquila has built thousands of hulls across its Molokai, Sport, Coupe and Yacht series since 2012, and MarineMax operates one of the largest used-boat brokerage and trade-in networks in the industry — meaning Aquila 54 owners generally have more comparable sales data, and more places to sell through, when it's time to move on. That liquidity is a genuine practical advantage of buying into a high-volume platform.
Buyers evaluating s60 vs aquila 54 total cost of ownership should also weigh the OceanWalker S60's structure: its €3.2M price already includes the options most owners would otherwise pay extra for on a tiered-pricing boat like the Aquila, which reduces the risk of unexpected spec-related costs at resale time. The right answer isn't automatic — it depends on whether resale liquidity or predictable all-in cost matters more to the buyer.
There's also a running-cost dimension worth factoring in. The Aquila 54's smaller hulls, lighter displacement and lower standard horsepower generally mean lower fuel burn, lower haul-out and antifoul costs, and lower marina berthing fees than the longer, beamier OceanWalker S60 — savings that add up across a typical ownership period regardless of purchase price. Set against that, the S60's all-inclusive pricing and smaller build run can mean fewer surprises at survey time, since the specification a buyer inspects is close to the specification every other S60 was delivered with. Total cost of ownership, in other words, is rarely just the purchase price on either boat.
Yes — Aquila 54 listings typically run $1.2M–$2.3M against the S60's €3.2M, reflecting the Aquila's smaller size and simpler standard specification.
The S60 is 18.87 m (60 ft) against the Aquila 54's 16.5 m (54'2") — about six feet longer, with a wider 8.38 m beam versus 7.68 m.
The OceanWalker S60 offers 4 en-suite guest cabins plus 2 crew berths; the Aquila 54 is built to a more compact standard layout suited to its shorter length.
For buyers prioritising entry price over size and specification, the Aquila 54 is a reasonable starting point, though it trades size, power and standard fit-out against the OceanWalker S60.
The Aquila 54 is available in 3, 4 or 5-cabin configurations, plus optional skipper's quarters and a galley-down layout, all built around a full-beam owner's suite — more flexibility than the OceanWalker S60's fixed 4 en-suite plus 2 crew arrangement.
The Aquila 54 is built by Sino Eagle Group in Hangzhou City, China, under a MarineMax partnership dating to 2012; it carries CE Category A ocean certification for offshore use.
Aquila's high production volume and MarineMax's large brokerage network typically give the Aquila 54 more resale liquidity, while the OceanWalker S60's all-inclusive €3.2M pricing reduces the risk of unexpected spec-related costs — the better long-term value depends on which factor matters more to the buyer.
The OceanWalker S60 is a larger, more powerful, single-specification 60-footer at €3.2M all-in; the Aquila 54 is a smaller, China-built, high-volume 54-footer distributed through MarineMax from roughly $1.59M–$2.2M new, with more layout flexibility and stronger resale liquidity but less size, power and standard fit-out than the S60. Buyers who prioritise entry price, layout choice and resale liquidity tend to lean Aquila; buyers who prioritise size, standard specification and predictable all-in cost tend to lean OceanWalker.
See what €3.2M buys at 60 feet
Compare the OceanWalker S60 to the Aquila 54 in person before you decide.
Book a Private Viewing